Skip to main content
. 2023 Sep 8;325(5):H1118–H1125. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00453.2023

Table 2.

Multiple regression assessing interactions between age and sex on MCA pulsatility in 396 adults

Model 1
Model 2
Model 3
B (95% CI) β B (95% CI) β B (95% CI) β
Age −0.01 (−0.02, −0.01) −1.71** −0.01 (−0.02, −0.01) −1.63** −0.01 (−0.01, −0.004) −1.07**
Age2 1.50 (0.90, 2.10) 1.61** 1.50 (0.90, 2.10) 1.60** 1.20 (0.60, 1.70) 1.24**
Female sex −0.12 (−0.19, −0.05) −0.49** −0.12 (−0.19, −0.05) −0.48** 0.001 (−0.07, 0.07) 0.00
Sex × age 0.003 (0.001, 0.004) 0.51** 0.002 (0.001, 0.004) 0.49* 0.00 (−0.001, 0.002) 0.02
BMI −0.001 (−0.004, 0.002) −0.05 0.001 (−0.002, 0.003) 0.02
MAP −0.001 (−0.002, 0.00) −0.08 −0.004 (−0.005, −0.002) −0.29**
CCA PP 0.006 (0.005, 0.007) 0.50**
Adjusted R2 0.074 0.074 0.264
Adjusted ΔR2 0.074 0.00 0.19
F statistic 8.88 5.00 16.76

Males, n = 189; females, n = 207. Age2 unstandardized beta is reported as ×10−4. Antihypertensive therapy and statin therapy use included as covariates in models 2 and 3 but are not reported. B, unstandardized beta weight; MCA, middle cerebral artery; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; MAP, mean arterial pressure; CCA PP, common carotid artery pulse pressure. Significant predictor at *P < 0.05 and **P ≤ 0.001.