Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 2;8:61. doi: 10.1038/s41698-024-00533-w

Table 2.

Cox proportional hazards regression models for the predictors of RFS in the LARC cohort (n = 242)

Variables Univariate Analysis Multivariate Analysis
RFS HR (95% CI) P value Model A Model B
HR (95% CI) P value HR (95% CI) P value
Sex (male vs female) 1.544 (0.967–2.466) 0.069
Age >60 vs. ≤60 1.005 (0.641–1.576) 0.983
Tumor grade (G1/2 vs. G3) 1.257 (0.508–3.112) 0.621
Tumor location (Medium/high vs. low) 0.904 (0.574–1.422) 0.662
In-TLS (no vs. yes) 1.504 (0.877–2.577) 0.138
Perineural invasion (no vs. yes) 0.478 (0.292–0.785) 0.004 0.751 (0.428–1.315) 0.316 0.721 (0.407–1.274) 0.260
Vascular invasion (no vs. yes) 0.354 (0.222–0.567) <0.001 0.771 (0.446–1.331) 0.350 0.791 (0.449–1.393) 0.417
TNM stage (III vs. II) 3.498 (2.157–5.673) <0.001 3.496 (2.108–5.799) <0.001 3.017 (1.822–4.997) <0.001
CD8+ T cells (low vs. high) 3.718 (2.212–6.250) <0.001 1.935 (1.069–3.502) 0.029 2.640 (1.517–4.593) 0.001
TLS density (low vs. high) 3.513 (2.109–5.851) <0.001 2.895 (1.612–5.200) <0.001
mTLS stage (mTLS- vs mTLS + ) 2.567 (1.592–4.139) <0.001 1.885 (1.125–3.159) 0.016
Adjuvant chemotherapy (FL/Capecitabine vs FOLFOX/XELOX) 0.839 (0.571–1.398) 0.621