Table 2.
Description of evaluation indicators for road data asset revenue allocation.
| Layer | Indicator | Indicator definitions | Indicator value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Evaluation of role contribution (the first layer) | External risks | The external environment constraints and influences on road data collection and use reflect the role's contribution in identifying, assessing, and responding to external risks | Subjective indicator: determined through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method |
| Policy risks | It requires close attention to changes and adjustments in relevant policies to promptly take corresponding measures for risk management and response | The value is taken from expert evaluation scores | |
| Legal risks | It requires compliance with relevant laws, regulations, and policy requirements to ensure the legality, security, and compliance of data | ||
| Internal risks | It is usually caused by inadequacies in aspects such as management, technology, and decision-making, reflecting the role's contribution in managing and controlling internal risks | Subjective indicator: determined through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method | |
| Equipment failure | It requires measures such as regular equipment inspection and maintenance, establishing comprehensive data backup and recovery mechanisms, etc. to reduce the likelihood of equipment failure | The values are taken from expert evaluation scores | |
| Data security | It requires measures such as establishing network security protection systems, strengthening access control and identity authentication mechanisms, etc. to enhance data security | ||
| Evaluation of participant contribution under the role of the original data collectors (the second layer) | Construction cost | It reflects the cost contribution of the data collection participant, which needs to be estimated based on the specific situation | Objective indicator: determined through accounting cost calculation |
| Data planning | The costs spent on market research and requirements analysis before data collection, to determine specific needs and functional requirements | The values are in monetary amounts | |
| Data collection | The costs incurred for purchasing and setting up the collection equipment and associated supporting facilities | ||
| Data storage | The costs sustained to establish appropriate data management and storage systems to effectively manage and store the collected data | ||
| Data demand | It describes the importance and difficulty of obtaining data to reflect the level of supply and demand of data in the market | Subjective indicator: determined through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method | |
| Demand level | It describes the importance and urgency of data requirements | The values are taken from expert evaluation scores | |
| Scarcity level | It describes the availability and supply level of data | ||
| Data characteristics | The quantitative information that describes the characteristics and attributes of a dataset reflects the value of the dataset itself | Objective indicators: determined through numerical analysis | |
| Data coverage | It delineates the scope of highway data collection, encompassing temporal and spatial coverage parameters | The values are time span and geographical scopes | |
| Data timeliness | It depicts the freshness of the data, as timely updated highway data can furnish accurate, real-time traffic information | The value is update frequency | |
| Evaluation of participant contribution under the role of the data processors (the second layer) | Data cleansing | The objective is to ensure the quality and accuracy of data, which is a fundamental task in data processing work | Objective indicators: determined through numerical analysis |
| Data volume | It describes the workload of data processing | The value is the number of data records | |
| Data quality | It is measured in terms of the degree of improvement in the completeness, validity, and consistency of the data compared to the original data | The value is the percentage of total data that meets the criteria | |
| Data analysis | It discovers correlations, trends, patterns, etc. in the data to provide understanding and decision support for the problem | Subjective indicator: determined through fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method | |
| Analysis methods | Techniques used to understand and interpret data, and appropriate analytical methods facilitate the discovery of potential information in the data | The value is taken from expert evaluation scores | |
| Analysis utility | It measures the practical value of data analysis results in decision-making and problem-solving by evaluating the effectiveness of providing insights that guide decision-making and improve performance | ||
| Evaluation of participant contribution under the role of the data product producers (the second layer) | Product development | Transforming road data into practical tools and solutions is the primary task for data product producers | Objective indicators: determined through numerical analysis |
| Workload | It measures the time and resources expended on product development | The value is the number of valid codes | |
| Difficulty coefficient | It measures the difficulty and complexity of product development | The value is 0–1 based on compared with the evaluation criteria | |
| Product maintenance | During the product operation stage, support, bug fixing, and improvements are carried out to ensure the continuous and reliable operation of the product and adapt to user needs and market changes | Objective indicators: determined through numerical analysis | |
| Stability | The running status of the product needs to be monitored, and any faults or errors that occur need to be addressed and fixed promptly | The value is the average number of stable days per month for the product | |
| Update frequency | As market demands are updated and change, there is a need for continuous improvements to the product's functions and features to provide greater value and user experience | The value is the average interval time of product innovation |