Table 5.

Pairwise comparisons of perceived nasality across various pitch conditions within both the groups

Condition	Group Aa		Group Bb
	Z value	P-value	Z value	P-value
Mid-pitch /a/—Low-pitch /a/	− 3.302	0.001	− 4.377	< 0.001
High-pitch /a/—Low-pitch /a/	− 3.41	0.001	− 4.374	< 0.001
High-pitch /a/—Mid-pitch /a/	− 3.355	0.001	− 4.375	< 0.001
Mid-pitch /pava/—Low-pitch /pava/	− 3.182	0.001	− 4.289	< 0.001
High-pitch /pava/—Low-pitch /pava/	− 3.411	0.001	− 4.373	< 0.001
High-pitch /pava/—Mid-pitch /pava/	− 3.298	0.001	− 4.376	< 0.001
Mid-pitch /mava/—Low-pitch /mava/	− 3.422	0.001	− 4.011	< 0.001
High-pitch /mava/—Low-pitch /mava/	− 3.409	0.001	− 4.374	< 0.001
High-pitch /mava/—Mid-pitch /mava/	− 2.557	0.011	− 4.347	< 0.001

^aSingers; ^bNonsingers; All comparisons were significant at P < 0.05 levels