Table 3. Studies on lung segmentation and localization proposed by different researchers.
| Study | Dataset | Model | Dice Coef. | Accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xue et al. (2020) | Shenzhen | Sample Selection + Joint Optimisation | – | 0.9253 |
| Rajaraman et al. (2018) | -Shenzhen -Montgomery -Private |
Customized VGG16 | – | 0.917 |
| Zhang et al. (2021) | -Shenzhen (S) -Montgomery (M) -Combination S + M |
DEFU-Net | 0.9154 0.9227 0.9667 |
– – 0.9804 |
| Balık & Kaya (2022) | -Kaggle Dataset | U-NET | – | 0.92 |
| Sharma et al. (2022) | Kaggle Dataset (Chest Xray Masks and Labels) | U-NET U-NET+ |
0.9488 0.9235 |
0.9635 0.9610 |
| Stirenko et al. (2018) | Shenzhen | DCNN | 0.74 | |
| Rajaraman et al. (2021a) | Shenzhen Tuberculosis X-ray (TBX11K) |
VGG16-CXR-U-Net VGG16-CXR-U-Net (AT) |
0.5189 0.7552 |
- - |
| Rajaraman et al. (2022) | Shenzhen | Stacked Ensemble | 0.5743 | – |
| Ngoc et al. (2022) | Shenzhen | Light-weight U-Net | 0.7252 | – |
| Proposed model | Shenzhen | RNGU-NET | 0.9721 | 0.9856 |