Skip to main content
. 2024 Jan 31;10:e1821. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1821

Table 8. Results comparison with past studies in feature extraction using customer review datasets.

Studies Precision Recall F-Measure Remarks
This study 0.91 0.88 0.89 41 pattern-rules
Pak & Günal (2022) NA NA 0.70 NA
Tran, Duangsuwan & Wettayaprasit (2021) 0.89 0.76 0.81 20 pattern-rules
Tubishat, Idris & Abushariah (2021) 0.75 0.97 0.84 126 rules without the optimizer
Tubishat, Idris & Abushariah (2021) 0.92 0.93 0.92 57 rules with optimizer
Chauhan & Meena (2020) 0.88 0.85 0.86 Noun based extractions
Rana & Cheah (2019) 0.86 0.91 0.89 10 pattern-rules
Asghar et al. (2019) 0.83 0.71 0.77 10 pattern- rules
Rana & Cheah (2017) 0.87 0.92 0.89 10 pattern-rules
Kang & Zhou (2017) 0.87 0.88 0.87 7 dependency rules with 8 patterns
Samha & Li (2016) 0.83 0.87 0.77 16 dependency rules
Liu et al. (2016) 0.85 0.91 0.88 8 pattern-rules
Khan & Jeong (2016) 0.81 0.82 0.8 9 pattern-rules
Maharani, Widyantoro & Khodra (2015) 0.63 0.73 0.67 24 pattern-rules
Khan, Baharudin & Khan (2014) 0.79 0.72 0.75 16 pattern-rules
Htay & Lynn (2013) 0.73 0.86 0.79 8 pattern-rules
Bagheri, Saraee & de Jong (2013) 0.86 0.64 0.73 4 pattern-rules
Qiu et al. (2011) 0.88 0.83 0.86 4 pattern-rules

Notes.

Bolded values indicate the results obtained for this study.