|
Kitchenham (2004)
|
Survey and case study |
Investigated the potential of unmanned aerial vehicles in smart cities using blockchain. |
Improved urban planning and emergency response and readiness. |
Limited UAV battery life and coverage range |
Develop energy-efficient UAVs |
|
Keele (2007)
|
Experimental study |
Used unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to monitor traffic using a blockchain-based system. |
Data on traffic in real time that is accurate and secure. |
High initial setup cost for blockchain |
Explore lightweight blockchain protocols |
|
Euchi (2021)
|
Simulation and comparative analysis |
Blockchain consensus techniques for UAV networks were compared and contrasted. |
Greater capacity for business transactions within UAV networks. |
Scalability issues with large UAV deployments |
Investigate hybrid consensus for UAVs |
|
Lagkas et al. (2018)
|
Analytical modeling |
Blockchain was used to develop a model that might improve UAV flight paths. |
Utilization of available resources in UAV operations in an effective manner. |
Limited network bandwidth for UAV communication |
Enhance communication protocols for UAVs |
|
Pathak et al. (2020)
|
Field experiment and survey |
Experiments were carried out in the real-world using UAVs equipped with blockchain technology. |
Integrity improvements implemented in the data collected in urban surveys. |
Regulatory challenges in drone deployment |
Address legal and privacy concerns in UAVs |
|
Sharma et al. (2020)
|
System prototype development |
Constructed a working model of a system that integrates UAVs and blockchain. |
Integrating UAVs smoothly into smart city initiatives. |
Integration challenges with existing systems |
Develop standardized APIs for UAV integration |
|
Yigitcanlar et al. (2020)
|
Comparative study and user feedback |
Analyzed the degree to which users were satisfied with blockchain-enabled UAV services. |
Satisfaction and participation among the populace increase. |
Limited standardization in UAV and blockchain technology |
Establish industry standards for UAV services |
|
Gupta et al. (2021)
|
Case study and stakeholder interviews |
Investigated how stakeholders think regarding unmanned aerial vehicles using blockchain technology. |
To learn more about how people feel about UAVs. |
Limited public acceptance of UAV technology |
Develop public awareness campaigns for UAVs |
|
Mendoza, Rodriguez & Lhuillery (2018)
|
Data analysis and machine learning |
For the analysis of UAV data, researchers made use of machine learning methods. |
Smart city decision-making is enhanced by better data analysis. |
Data privacy concerns related to UAV surveillance |
Develop privacy-preserving data analytics for UAVs |
|
Stankov et al. (2019)
|
Simulation and network optimization |
Communication networks for unmanned aerial vehicles that are optimized utilizing blockchain. |
Improved communication in terms of both speed and reliability. |
Potential security vulnerabilities in blockchain |
Implement advanced encryption techniques |
|
Pamnani & Parvathi (2021)
|
Field testing and performance evaluation |
Researchers conducted tests to see how well UAVs equipped with blockchain technology performed in actual city settings. |
Monitoring in real time of metropolitan areas. |
Limited scalability due to blockchain complexity |
Explore scalable blockchain solutions for UAVs |
|
Alam, Chamoli & Hasan (2022)
|
Comparative analysis and cost-benefit study |
Using blockchain, researchers analyzed the efficiency of the costs associated with UAVs. |
Reduced costs associated with processes while also improving efficiency. |
High transaction fees and network congestion |
Optimize blockchain parameters for cost efficiency |