Table 4. Comparative outcome of DTODCNN-CC method with other systems.

Methods	$\mathit{A}\mathit{c}\mathit{c}{\mathit{u}}_{\mathit{y}}$	$\mathit{P}\mathit{r}\mathit{e}{\mathit{c}}_{\mathit{n}}$	$\mathit{R}\mathit{e}\mathit{c}{\mathit{a}}_{\mathit{l}}$	${\mathit{F}}_{\mathit{S}\mathit{c}\mathit{o}\mathit{r}\mathit{e}}$
DTODCNN-CC	98.19	92.99	91.44	92.18
SBODL-FCC	97.91	89.55	85.51	87.16
DNN model	86.69	86.66	84.85	86.74
Alex Net	91.00	88.15	82.24	83.81
VGG-16 Model	90.86	85.73	81.79	86.23
ResNet model	88.21	86.88	81.64	83.48
SVM model	87.17	88.49	84.15	84.75