Table 2.
Principal elements of the studies which formed part of the present systematic analysis
| Author | Year | Nationality | Number of case vs. control | Age | Diagnostic tool of TMD | Correlation between Axis I and II | Significance of study |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alrashdan | 2022 | Jordan | 98 patients/49 patients | 32.7 years |
DC/TMD Axis I DC/TMD Axis II |
Pain related TMD r 0.312 0.002* IAD r − .309 0.002* Headeche r 0.317 0.001* |
Association between clinical symptoms and psychosocial status |
| Winocur-Arias | 2022 | Israel | 255 patients/66 patients | 37 yrs |
DC/TMD Axis I DC/TMD Axis II |
Myofascial pain. With referral 6.38 ± 5.61 6.00 (2.00–8.00) P:0.033* |
Myofascial pain with referral is associated and correlated with increased depressive state and thus with Axis II |
| Reiter | 2021 | Israel | 220 patients/60 patients | 37.8 yrs |
DC/TMD Axis I DC/TMD Axis II |
Patients with HAattrTMD Evaluated in axis I and II (P = .008)* |
HAattrTMD group had significantly higher levels of depression |
| Yildiz | 2023 | Turkey | 200 patients/507 patients | 28.46 |
DC/TMD Axis I DC/TMD Axis II |
TMJ internal disorders association with Axis II 0.206* |
The results of DC / TMD Axis I are compared with Axis II |
*Statistically significant correlation