Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 29;12:e16783. doi: 10.7717/peerj.16783

Table 2. Multilevel model results.

Species abundance Species presence Shannon diversity
Model component Parameter estimate Standard error Confidence interval Parameter estimate Standard error Confidence interval Parameter estimate Standard error Confidence interval
Fixed terms (Intercept) −0.50 0.35 −1.19, 0.19 −1.62 *** 0.41 −2.42, −0.82 0.80 *** 0.03 0.75, 0.85
Year 0.12+ 0.07 −0.01, 0.26 −0.09 0.12 −0.32, 0.15 −0.04 0.03 −0.1, 0.03
Management −0.40 * 0.17 −0.73, 0.07 −0.55 * 0.22 −0.98, −0.11 −0.01 ** 0.03 −0.16, −0.03
Year × Management 0.07 0.1 −0.12, 0.27 0.226 0.17 −0.11, 0.56 0.04 0.04 −0.05, 0.12
Random terms SD (Intercept plot/site) 0.23 0.29 0.03
SD (Intercept site) 0.23 0.18 0.01
SD (Intercept species) 1.84 2.15
SD (management slope species) 0.37 0.52 0.13
Dispersion (Intercept) 11.04 9.95, 12.26
Num.Obs. 5,100 5,100 150
AIC 11,231.5 654,395 −156.3

Notes:

The table shows the parameter estimates, their standard errors and confidence intervals of our models for species abundance, presence and Shannon diversity (for the full model without a random slope for year).

***

Marks p < 0.001.

**

Marks p < 0.01.

*

Indicates p < 0.05.

+

Indicates p < 0.1.

The negative parameter estimate for treatment implies a lower abundance in mowed areas. The standard deviations for each random term are also given, as well as the model AICs. Significant results are highlighted in bold.