Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 2;8(1):102334. doi: 10.1016/j.rpth.2024.102334

Table 5.

Comparison of the population with isolated low von Willebrand factor ristocetin cofactor vs type 1 von Willebrand disease.

Characteristic Isolated low VWF:RCo n = 33 Type 1 VWD n = 75 P value
Demographics
 Age 15.8 (11.0-17.9) 15.8 (7.7-17.4) .90a
 Female sex 25 (61.0%) 56 (74.7%) .12b
 ISTH BAT BS 4 (3-5) 4 (3-5) .26a
Procedure information
 No. of procedures 41 120
 Bleeding events 2 6
 Bleeding frequency 4.9% 5.0% .84b
Surgical type
 Major 16 (39.0%) 43 (35.8%)
 Minor 17 (41.5%) 49 (40.8%)
 Dental 8 (19.5%) 28 (23.3%) .86b
Prophylaxis plan
 Antifibrinolytic only 35 (85.4) 93 (77.5)
 Antifibrinolytic + DDAVP 4 (9.8) 13 (10.8)
 Antifibrinolytic + VWF concentrate 0 12 (10.0)
 DDAVP only 0 1 (0.8)
 None 2 (4.9) 1 (0.8) .07b

BAT, bleeding assessment tool; BS, bleeding score; DDAVP, desmopressin; ISTH, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis; VWD, von Willebrand disease; VWF, von Willebrand factor; RCo, ristocetin cofactor.

b

Mann–Whitney U-test.

a

Fisher’s exact test.