Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 3;14:5209. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55739-6

Table 3.

Hazard ratio (95% CI) of gestational diabetes by tertiles of red and processed meat intake (n = 635).

Tertile Tertile 1 Tertile 2 Tertile 3
Red and processed meat (g/d) 0–8.22 8.55–14.14 14.25–90
Participants//cases 212/17 213/34 210/29
Person-week 7882 7600 7699
Unadjusted HR and 95%CI 1.0 1.64 (0.90, 2.99) 2.13 (1.19, 3.82)
Multivariable-adjusted HR 1.0 1.37 (0.74, 2.52) 1.92 (1.06, 3.49)
P-value 0.319 0.032
Red meat (g/d) 0–4 4–13 13–90
Participants//cases 212/22 211/28 212/30
Person-week 8034 7992 7776
Unadjusted HR and 95%CI 1 1.21 (0.71, 2.09) 1.81 (1.04, 3.15)
Multivariable-adjusted HR 1 0.97 (0.56, 1.67) 1.52 (0.85, 2.72)
P-value 0.814 0.039
Processed meat (g/d) 0 0.1–2.9 3.3–31.1
Participants//cases 386/29 124/21 125/16
Person-week 14,590 4388 4203
Unadjusted HR and 95%CI 1 1.54 (0.92, 2.60) 1.16 (0.65, 2.05)
Multivariable adjusted HR 1 1.56 (0.92, 2.65) 1.31 (0.73, 2.34)
P-value 0.102 0.364

P value was obtained by cox regression analysis, adjusted for age, having job with income, pre-pregnancy body mass index, history of cardiovascular disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, pregnancy hypertension, order of pregnancy, nausea during current pregnancy, multivitamin use during current pregnancy, physical activities, weight gain during current pregnancy and total energy intake.

HR hazard ratio.