Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2025 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Med Phys. 2023 Sep 4;51(3):1726–1737. doi: 10.1002/mp.16715

Table 1.

Correlation and linear regression results

11.3 mGy/s 3.6 mGy/s 1.3 mGy/s
SLS PHS STF SLS PHS STF SLS PHS STF
ρ 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.98 0.99 0.99 0.91 0.93 0.99*
p 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
a 1.59 0.93 1.00 1.65 1.00 1.01 0.92 0.92 1.02
b −5.67 2.21 5.45 −7.05 −0.29 5.53 12.47 2.51 4.60
R2 0.96 0.98 0.97 0.96 0.98 0.98 0.83 0.87 0.97

Pearson correlation ρ and corresponding p-value are shown for least squared fit (SLS), phase shift (PHS), and the proposed spatiotemporal frequency (STF) approach and all three pre-patient air kerma rates (scaled to the interventional reference point). Additionally, linear regression parameters a and b and corresponding goodness of fit (R2) are listed.