Table 1.
Correlation and linear regression results
11.3 mGy/s | 3.6 mGy/s | 1.3 mGy/s | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLS | PHS | STF | SLS | PHS | STF | SLS | PHS | STF | |
0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.98 | 0.99 | 0.99 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.99* | |
0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
1.59 | 0.93 | 1.00 | 1.65 | 1.00 | 1.01 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 1.02 | |
−5.67 | 2.21 | 5.45 | −7.05 | −0.29 | 5.53 | 12.47 | 2.51 | 4.60 | |
0.96 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.83 | 0.87 | 0.97 |
Pearson correlation and corresponding p-value are shown for least squared fit (SLS), phase shift (PHS), and the proposed spatiotemporal frequency (STF) approach and all three pre-patient air kerma rates (scaled to the interventional reference point). Additionally, linear regression parameters and and corresponding goodness of fit () are listed.