Table 2.

Synthesis table.

	Study (number of participants)
Predictors	Hsu et al. (2021) (n = 110,044)	Lewis et al. (2019) (n = 2,814,041)	Meisel et al. (2010) (n = 683)	Rothrock et al. (2001) (n = 2858)	Dawson et al. (2023) (n = 256,901)	Muhrbeck et al. (2020) (n = 539)	Melberg et al. (2013) (n = 244)	Banks & Dracup (2007) (n = 61)	O’Donnell et al. (2006) (n = 890)
Patient sex
Male	70,495	1,153,769	342	1350	127,805	385	179	32	613
Female	39,549	1,223,754	341	1508	129,096	154	65	29	277
Ambulance response times for women (compared to men)					OR: 0.99 95% CI: 0.98–1.01	14 minutes compared to 13 minutes p-value = 0.084	57 minutes compared to 35 minutes p-value = 0.006
Symptom to ED time for women taken via ambulance (compared to men)								3.1 hours compared to 0.58 hours p-value = 0.04	14 hours compared to 2.8 hours p-value = < 0.0001
Ambulance arrival to ECG in 10 minutes for women (compared to men)						99 minutes compared to 19 minutes p-value = 0.001
Women receiving ECG assessment (compared to men)	OR: 0.88 CI: 0.83–0.92 12% less likely than men	48.8% compared to 50.5% Difference: -2.7% 95% CI: -5.7, 2.2	OR: 0.80 79% compared to 82% p-value = 0.21	OR: 0.50 39.3% compared 46.8% p-value = < 0.001	OR: 0.82 95% CI: 0.81–0.83
Women receiving aspirin (compared to men)	OR: 0.79 CI: 0.76–0.81 21% less likely than men	42.5% compared to 45.3% Difference: -2.8% 95% CI: -4.8, -0.8	OR: 0.60 24% compared to 32% p-value = 0.03	OR: 0.71 35.4% compared to 42.3% p-value = < 0.001	OR: 0.86 95% CI: 0.84–0.87
Women receiving GTN (compared to men)	OR: 0.84 CI: 0.81–0.86 16% less likely than men	41% compared to 43.7% Difference: -2.7% 95% CI: -4.8, -0.6	OR: 0.60 26% compared to 33% p-value = 0.02	OR: 1.0 32.9% compared to 33.1% p-value = 0.569
Women receiving analgesic administration for pain (compared to men)					OR: 0.85 95% CI: 0.83–0.88