Definitions of Certainty (Quality) of the Evidence
|
High |
Very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect |
Moderate |
Moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different |
Low |
Confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect |
Very low |
Very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
Definitions of Strong and Conditional Recommendations and Implications for Users
|
Implications for patients |
Strong recommendations |
Most patients in this situation would want the recommended course of action, and only a small proportion would not. Formal decision aids are not likely to be needed to help patients make decisions consistent with their values and preferences |
Conditional recommendations |
Most patients in this situation would want the suggested course of action, but many would not |
Implications for clinicians |
Strong recommendations |
Most patients should receive the intervention. Adherence to this recommendation according to the guideline could be used as a quality criterion or performance indicator |
Conditional recommendations |
Recognize that different choices will be appropriate for individual patients and that the clinician must help each patient arrive at a management decision consistent with his or her values and preferences. Decision aids may be useful in helping patients make decisions consistent with their values and preferences |
Implications for policy makers |
Strong recommendations |
The recommendation can be adapted as policy in most situations |
Conditional recommendations |
Policy making will require substantial debate and involvement of various stakeholders |