Table 4.
Validity analysis (confirmatory factor analysis) of the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire (DEBQ).
| Model structure adjustment | TLI | CFI | RMSEA | SRMR | LR/X² | AIC | BIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural equation modeling | |||||||
| 3 factors (original model) | 0.84 | 0.85 | 0.083 | 0.086 | 132.35 (p < 0.001)† | 16242.54 | 16576.38 |
| 6 factors (EFA model) | 0.87 | 0.88 | 0.076 | 0.073 | 16134.19 | 16507.31 | |
| Generalized structural equation modeling | n | df | Log likelihood (full model) | AIC | BIC | ||
| 3 factors | 195 | 134 | −8818.05 | 17904.09 | 18342.67 | ||
| 4 factors | 195 | 168 | −8574.01 | 17484.02 | 18033.89 | ||
| 5 factors | 195 | 202 | −8397.00 | 17198.01 | 17859.16 | ||
| 6 factors | 195 | 270 | −8225.34 | 16990.67 | 17874.38 | ||
| 7 factors | 195 | 270 | −8225.34 | 16990.67 | 17874.38 | ||
AIC, Akaike information criterion; BIC, Bayesian information criterion; CFI, comparative fit index; df, degrees of freedom; EFA, exploratory factor analysis. n, number of observations; RMSEA, root mean square error of approximation; SRMR, standardized root mean squared residual; TLI, Tucker–Lewis Index; LR/X², likelihood-ratio test/chi-square.
†
Comparing 3-factor with 6-factor model.