Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb;17(2):47–51.

TABLE 3.

Comparisons of both treatment modalities after treatment regarding CEA, VAS, and CTA scores, as well as patients’ satisfaction and side effects.

GRADING SCALES AFTER TXA WITH MICRONEEDLING (N = 45) AFTER TXA ONLY (N = 45) STATISTICAL TEST p-VALUE
CEA
  Clear skin 7 15.6% 0 0% X2 = 43.5 < 0.001 HS
  Slight redness 31 68.9% 7 15.6%
  Definite redness 6 13.3% 31 68.9%
  Marked redness 1 2.2% 7 15.6%
VAS
  Mean ± SD 1.11 ± 0.3 1.93 ± 0.68 MW = 52.5 < 0.001 HS
CTA
  No response 2 4.4% 20 44.4% X2 = 51.3 < 0.001 HS
  Poor response 5 11.1% 17 37.8%
  Fair response 8 17.8% 8 17.8%
  Good response 19 42.2% 0 0%
  Excellent response 11 24.4% 0 0%
Patients’ satisfaction
  Fair 7 15.6% 35 77.8% X2 = 39.2 < 0.001 HS
  Moderate 22 48.9% 10 22.2%
  Very good 16 35.6% 0 0%
Side effects
  No 36 80% 45 100% X2 = 10 0.002 S
  Yes 9 20% 0 0%

TXA: tranexamic acid; CEA: clinician erythema assessment score; VAS: visual analogue scales; CTA: clinician telangiectasia assessment grades; SD: standard deviation; X2: Chi square test; MW: Mann-Whitney test; HS: p-value < 0.001 is considered highly significant. S: p-value < 0.05 is considered significant.