Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 27;12:RP88619. doi: 10.7554/eLife.88619

Figure 7. SNAP25 V48F and D166Y mutations change short-term plasticity toward facilitation.

(A, E) eEPSCs in response to 50 APs at 40 Hz recorded in 4 mM extracellular Ca2+ (V48F: 27, 17, 15 for wildtype [WT], co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 27, 18, 16). Inserts: Normalized eEPSC amplitudes demonstrating facilitation of mutant conditions. ****p < 0.0001; **p < 0.01, Brown–Forsythe analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. (B, F) Priming rate calculated as the slope of a linear fit to the cumulative evoked charges during the last part of stimulation (V48F: 27, 17, 15 for WT, co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 27, 18, 16). *p < 0.05, ANOVA (V48F) or Brown–Forsythe ANOVA (D166Y) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (C, G) Readily releasable pool (RRP) calculated by back-extrapolation of a linear fit to the cumulative evoked charges during the last part of stimulation (V48F: 27, 17, 15 for WT, co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 27, 18, 16). **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05, ANOVA (V48F), or Brown–Forsythe ANOVA (D166Y) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test. (D, H) Release probability calculated as the charge of the first evoked response divided by the RRP obtained by back-extrapolation (V48F: 27, 17, 15 for WT, co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 27, 18, 16). ***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01, ANOVA (V48F), or Brown–Forsythe ANOVA (D166Y) with Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test.

Figure 7—source data 1. Excel file containing quantitative data.

Figure 7.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1. Train stimulations of V48F and D166Y in 2 mM Ca2+.

Figure 7—figure supplement 1.

(A, D) eEPSCs in response to 50 APs at 40 Hz recorded in 2 mM extracellular Ca2+ (V48F: 25, 18, 24 for wildtype [WT], co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 23, 15, 15). Inserts: Normalized eEPSC amplitudes of first ten stimulations. *p < 0.05, ***p < 0.001, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Dunnett’s multiple comparison test. (B, E) Priming rate calculated by as the slope of a linear fit to the cumulative evoked charges during the last part of stimulation (V48F: 24, 18, 24 for WT, co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 23, 15, 15). (C, F) Readily releasable pool (RRP) calculated by back-extrapolation of a linear fit to the cumulative evoked charges during the last part of stimulation (V48F: 24, 18, 24 for WT, co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 23, 15, 15).
Figure 7—figure supplement 1—source data 1. Excel file containing quantitative data.
Figure 7—figure supplement 2. Cumulative charges of V48F and D166Y trains in 4 mM Ca2+.

Figure 7—figure supplement 2.

(A, B) Cumulative charges obtained by integrating eEPSCs during 40 Hz trains. The slope of the linear part of the curve reports on the priming rate, which is reduced by the mutations. The back-extrapolation of the linear fit to zero time reports on the RRPev, the part of the readily releasable pool (RRP) which APs draw on, which is also reduced by mutation (V48F: n = 27, 17, 15 for wildtype [WT], co-expressed, and mutant conditions, respectively; D166Y: 27, 18, 16).