Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;2024(3):CD007491. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007491.pub3

Wilson 1999.

Study characteristics
Methods Parallel randomised trial
Study conducted between November 1995 and May 1997.
Participants Setting: UK
Patients with a mix of conditions (majority elderly) referred by GP to Bed Bureau
Number recruited: hospital at home: 102; inpatient: 97
6 patients refused hospital at home care and were admitted to hospital.
Interventions Hospital at home (admission avoidance)
Type of service: multidisciplinary team (nurses, therapy, generic health workers, cultural link worker)
Referred by a GP, who maintains medical responsibility
Maximum of 5 patients at a time
Control group: inpatient hospital care
Outcomes Mortality, readmission, functional status, quality of life, patient satisfaction
Notes Follow‐up: 3 days, 2 weeks, 3 months
Funding: National R&D Programme, Primary‐Secondary Care Interface, NHS Executive, North Thames (UK)
Conflicts of interest: none reported
Ethical approval: local ethics committee
This author contributed IPD for a previous update of this review (Shepperd 2016a).
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Block randomisation
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Consecutively numbered, sealed envelopes
Baseline outcome measurements (selection bias) Low risk Baseline outcome measurements done prior to intervention for functional status and quality of life; no relevant differences found
Baseline characteristics (selection bias) Low risk Baseline characteristics of the study and control groups are reported and are similar
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
All outcomes Low risk Outcome assessments by independent research staff, decision to admit made by hospital staff, not research team
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Low risk Low risk for health status (Sickness Impact Profile 68), cognitive function (Clifton Assessment Procedures for the Elderly), functional status (Barthel Index), and quality of life (EuroQol)
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Low risk for mortality, readmission, resource use and cost
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Loss to follow‐up: hospital at home: 8/87; hospital: 5/80
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All outcomes reported (received trial data set)

A&E: accident & emergency department
C: control
COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
ED: emergency department
FEV1: forced expiratory volume in 1 second
GHHS: geriatric home hospitalisation service
GP: general practitioner
HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale
IPD: individual patient data
IQR: interquartile range
IV: intravenous
MMSE: Mini‐Mental State Examination
NIHR: National Institute for Health and Care Research
NYHA: New York Heart Association
OPD: outpatient department
SD: standard deviation
SF‐12: 12‐Item Short Form Health Survey
SF‐36: 36‐Item Short Form Health Survey
SpO2: oxygen saturation
T: treatment