Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;36(1):53. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02663-w

Table 2.

Ultrasonographic measurements of rectus femoris among robust, pre-frail, and frail groups

Ultrasonographic findings of RF (mean ± SD) (n = 301) Robust (n = 102) Pre-frail (n = 125) Frail (n = 74) p value
Thickness (mm)* 12.45 ± 2.58a 11.6 ± 2.48b 11.12 ± 2.32b 0.002
CSA (mm2)** 4.2 (1.7–10.8)a 3.9 (1.6–7.9)a,b 3.7 (1.8–7.2)b 0.009
Muscle stiffness (kPa)** 15.25 (3.63–33.0) 15.75 (5.15–30.5) 14.38 (4.25–35.25) 0.802
Fascicle length (mm)** 55.0 (39.0–70.0)a 53.0 (38.0–66.0)b 53.7 (36.3–66.7)a,b 0.043
Pennation angle (degree)* 11.19 ± 2.12a 10.12 ± 2.27b 9.14 ± 1.85c <0.001
Hyperechogenicity (n/%) 8 (7.8) 9 (7.2) 10 (13.5) 0.285

Bolds are statistically significant values

RF rectus femoris muscle; CSA cross-sectional area

*Mean ± SD

** Median(min–max)

a,b,c The groups with the same letters are not significantly different according to pairwise comparisons