Table 2.
Comparison of the performance of two models for predicting SAE.
| Predict model | AUROC | P-value | NRI (categorical) | P-value | NRI (continuous) | P-value | IDI | P-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Training set | Nomogram | 0.751 | |||||||
| SOFA + Delirium | 0.725 | <0.001 | 0.0493[0.0177–0.0808] | 0.002 | 0.3484[0.278–0.4189] | <0.001 | 0.0279[0.0194–0.0364] | <0.001 | |
| Validation set | Nomogram | 0.766 | |||||||
| SOFA + Delirium | 0.742 | 0.008 | 0.0504[0.0042–0.0965] | 0.03 | 0.3814[0.2731–0.4897] | <0.001 | 0.0268[0.0139–0.0397] | <0.001 |
The P-value was calculated by comparing the results of nomogram with SOFA plus Delirium. SOFA, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment; AUROC, Area Under the ROC Curve; NRI, Net Reclassification Improvement; IDI, Integrated Discrimination Improvement.