Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 12;13(4):995–1014. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-00898-y

Table 2.

Baseline study eye characteristics (intent-to-treat population)

SE-implant (N = 197) FE-implant (N = 200) Timolol (N = 193) Total (N = 590)
Diagnosis
 Open-angle glaucoma (OAG)a 170 (86.3) 175 (87.5) 167 (86.5) 512 (86.8)
 Ocular hypertension (OHT) 27 (13.7) 25 (12.5) 26 (13.5) 78 (13.2)
Number of glaucoma medication classes used at screening, n (%)
 0 54 (27.4) 43 (21.5) 46 (23.8) 143 (24.2)
 1 99 (50.3) 116 (58.0) 100 (51.8) 315 (53.4)
 2 38 (19.3) 37 (18.5) 41 (21.2) 116 (19.7)
 3 6 (3.0) 4 (2.0) 6 (3.1) 16 (2.7)
Screening IOP (mmHg)
 Mean (SD) 19.77 (4.46) 19.52 (4.50) 19.67 (4.35) 19.66 (4.43)
Mean (SD) IOP (mmHg) at baseline
 8 a.m. 24.37 (3.25) 24.72 (3.40) 24.72 (3.51) 24.60 (3.39)
 10 a.m. 24.09 (3.32) 24.27 (3.27) 24.03 (3.10) 24.13 (3.23)
 4 p.m. 23.59 (3.15) 23.57 (3.14) 23.61 (3.17) 23.59 (3.15)
Iris color, n (%)
 Blue 41 (20.8) 57 (28.5) 55 (28.5) 153 (25.9)
 Brown 122 (61.9) 109 (54.5) 106 (54.9) 337 (57.1)
 Green 7 (3.6) 7 (3.5) 7 (3.6) 21 (3.6)
 Hazel 27 (13.7) 26 (13.0) 25 (13.0) 78 (13.2)
 Other 0 1 (0.5) 0 1 (0.2)

FE-implant fast-eluting travoprost intracameral implant, IOP intraocular pressure, OAG open-angle glaucoma, OHT ocular hypertension, SD standard deviation, SE-implant slow-eluting travoprost intracameral implant

aOpen-angle glaucoma included juvenile, primary, pigmentary, and pseudoexfoliative