Table 2. Risk of bias assessment for non-randomized intervention study by using ROBINS-I tool.
| Study | D1 | D2 | D3 | D4 | D5 | D6 | D7 | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cerit et al., 2023 [14] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Cheng et al., 2017 [15] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Hu et al., 2019 [16] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Javadov et al., 2021 [17] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Jin et al., 2021 [18] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Korkusuz et al., 2018 [19] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Sönmez et al., 2023 [20] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Vorländer et al., 2018 [21] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Yue et al., 2017 [22] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
D1: Bias due to confounding, D2: Bias due to selection of participants, D3: Bias in classification of interventions, D4: Bias due to deviations from intended interventions, D5: Bias due to missing data, D6: Bias in measurement of outcomes, D7: Bias in selection of the reported result.
D = domain, ROBINS-I = Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies - of Interventions, + = low, x = serious