TABLE 2.

Intensity, weekly and total volume, and proportion of exercise type by study arm.

Author and year	Study arm a	Intensity (time-weighted average of MET)	Total volume (MET-hours)	Proportion aerobic	Proportion balance	Proportion resistance	Proportion others
Angelucci et al. (2016)	Multimodal	2.5	123.2	0.32	0.12	0	0.55
Da Silva Germanos et al. (2019)	Multimodal	3.7	24.7	0.32	0	0.54	0.14
Oliveira et al. (2020)	Multimodal	3.9	32.8	0.70	0.16	0	0.14
Frazzitta et al. (2014)	Multimodal	2.4	103.7	0.39	0.12	0	0.49
Freidle et al. (2022)	Multimodal	3.1	73.3	0.16	0.68	0.16	0
	Speech and communication	1.3	28.2	0	0	0	1
Harro et al. (2022)	Endurance	4.2	60.4	1	0	0	0
Landers et al. (2019)	Multimodal (high intensity)	3.8	215.4	0.38	0.13	0.38	0.1
	Multimodal (low intensity)	2.7	90	0.31	0.19	0.33	0.17
O'Callaghan et al. (2020)	Aerobic + Resistance	3.5	123.1	0.72	0	0.23	0.04
	High-Intensity Interval Training	5.3	111	0	0	1	0
Ponde et al. (2019)	Aerobic	2.5	36	0.89	0	0	0.11
Sajatovic et al. (2017)	Aerobic + Resistance (peer support)	3.5	105	0.60	0	0.40	0
	Aerobic + Resistance	3.5	105	0.60	0	0.40	0
Schaeffer et al. (2022)	Aerobic	4	54	1	0	0	0
Segura et al. (2020)	Aerobic	4.3	144.4	0.87	0	0	0.13
Soke et al. (2021)	Aerobic + Resistance	3.9	98.8	0.47	0	0.53	0
	Aerobic	3.8	46	1	0	0	0
Stuckenschneider et al. (2021)	Multimodal	3.6	65.6	0.38	0.23	0.38	0
Szymura et al. (2020)	Aerobic	3.2	114	0.13	0.87	0	0
Zoladz et al. (2014)	Aerobic	3.2	76	1	0	0	0

^a Definition of exercise intervention according Zhou B et al. in Aging Neurosci 2022 (Zhou et al., 2022).