Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 4;14:5307. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-55077-7

Table 2.

Classification results.

Classification criteria Linear neural network SVM Random forest XGBoost Logistic regression

PD/HC

2 classes: HC, PD

 Accuracy 0.809 (0.138) 0.842 (0.126) 0.817 (0.099) 0.878 (0.116) 0.840 (0.131)
 Precision 0.826 (0.136) 0.862 (0.111) 0.818 (0.107) 0.853 (0.152) 0.856 (0.126)
 Recall 0.802 (0.142) 0.839 (0.143) 0.816 (0.104) 0.860 (0.142) 0.824 (0.158)
 F1 score 0.792 (0.141) 0.829 (0.136) 0.801 (0.106) 0.841 (0.150) 0.817 (0.151)

H&Y

6 classes: HC, stage 1–5

 Accuracy 0.575 (0.177) 0.689 (0.168) 0.682 (0.151) 0.715 (0.140) 0.658 (0.162)
 Precision 0.487 (0.241) 0.371 (0.217) 0.423 (0.214) 0.467 (0.233) 0.477 (0.237)
 Recall 0.471 (0.206) 0.446 (0.199) 0.464 (0.237) 0.520 (0.236) 0.520 (0.209)
 F1 score 0.454 (0.208) 0.388 (0.203) 0.427 (0.218) 0.473 (0.224) 0.472 (0.215)

MDS-UPDRS Part III

4 classes: HC, mild, moderate, severe

 Accuracy 0.560 (0.168) 0.636 (0.170) 0.476 (0.144) 0.570 (0.165) 0.628 (0.171)
 Precision 0.521 (0.194) 0.579 (0.217) 0.460 (0.177) 0.528 (0.191) 0.557 (0.218)
 Recall 0.506 (0.188) 0.613 (0.212) 0.494 (0.149) 0.539 (0.183) 0.600 (0.191)
 F1 score 0.477 (0.176) 0.555 (0.206) 0.438 (0.143) 0.501 (0.174) 0.544 (0.198)

aBold font suggests the best results under a certain classification and evaluation criterion.