Table 2.
Classification results.
| Classification criteria | Linear neural network | SVM | Random forest | XGBoost | Logistic regression |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
PD/HC 2 classes: HC, PD | |||||
| Accuracy | 0.809 (0.138) | 0.842 (0.126) | 0.817 (0.099) | 0.878 (0.116) | 0.840 (0.131) |
| Precision | 0.826 (0.136) | 0.862 (0.111) | 0.818 (0.107) | 0.853 (0.152) | 0.856 (0.126) |
| Recall | 0.802 (0.142) | 0.839 (0.143) | 0.816 (0.104) | 0.860 (0.142) | 0.824 (0.158) |
| F1 score | 0.792 (0.141) | 0.829 (0.136) | 0.801 (0.106) | 0.841 (0.150) | 0.817 (0.151) |
|
H&Y 6 classes: HC, stage 1–5 | |||||
| Accuracy | 0.575 (0.177) | 0.689 (0.168) | 0.682 (0.151) | 0.715 (0.140) | 0.658 (0.162) |
| Precision | 0.487 (0.241) | 0.371 (0.217) | 0.423 (0.214) | 0.467 (0.233) | 0.477 (0.237) |
| Recall | 0.471 (0.206) | 0.446 (0.199) | 0.464 (0.237) | 0.520 (0.236) | 0.520 (0.209) |
| F1 score | 0.454 (0.208) | 0.388 (0.203) | 0.427 (0.218) | 0.473 (0.224) | 0.472 (0.215) |
|
MDS-UPDRS Part III 4 classes: HC, mild, moderate, severe | |||||
| Accuracy | 0.560 (0.168) | 0.636 (0.170) | 0.476 (0.144) | 0.570 (0.165) | 0.628 (0.171) |
| Precision | 0.521 (0.194) | 0.579 (0.217) | 0.460 (0.177) | 0.528 (0.191) | 0.557 (0.218) |
| Recall | 0.506 (0.188) | 0.613 (0.212) | 0.494 (0.149) | 0.539 (0.183) | 0.600 (0.191) |
| F1 score | 0.477 (0.176) | 0.555 (0.206) | 0.438 (0.143) | 0.501 (0.174) | 0.544 (0.198) |
aBold font suggests the best results under a certain classification and evaluation criterion.