Table 5. TUG meta-analysis results.

TUG, The Timed Up and Go.

Study or subgroup	Experimental			Control			Weight	Std. Mean Difference
	Mean	SD	Total	Mean	SD	Total		IV, Random, 95% CI
Gomiero et al., 2017	7.9	0.21	32	8.7	0.51	32	20.4%	-2.03 [-2.64, -1.42]
Jahanjoo et al., 2019	7.61	0.3	30	9.54	0.3	30	17.9%	-6.35 [-7.63, -5.07]
Tunay et al., 2010	5.19	1.05	30	5.39	1.46	30	20.6%	-0.16 [-0.66, 0.35]
Xiao et al., 2020	7.7	2.7	40	7.9	2.2	45	20.8%	-0.08 [-0.51, 0.35]
Hiyama et al., 2012	12.0	1.5	20	13.0	2.2	20	20.3%	-0.52 [-1.15, 0.11]
Total (95% CI)			152			157	100.0%	-1.71 [-3.09, -0.33]

Heterogeneity: Tau ² = 2.34; Chi ² = 105.66, df = 4 (p < 0.00001); I ² = 96%.

Test for overall effect: Z = 2.42 (p = 0.02).