Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 20;49(1):31–37. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.D23-057

Table 3. LC50 value and resistance ratio for oxazosulfyl, imidacloprid and fipronil against the susceptible strains and field populations of planthoppers.

Insecticide Speciesa) Strain/Populationb) LC50c) CI 95% Slope RRd)
Oxazosulfyle) BPH S 0.41 0.32–0.51 2.4
Kagoshima 0.78 0.61–0.97 2.4 1.9
WBPH S 0.82 0.65–1.06 2.3
Kagoshima 0.69 0.55–0.87 2.2 0.8
SBPH S 0.61 0.48–0.79 2.1
Kagoshima 0.23 0.16–0.30 1.7 0.4
Imidacloprid BPH S 0.19 0.14–0.24 1.8
Kagoshima 106.29 79.49–143.90 1.5 568.4
WBPH S 0.17 0.14–0.21 2.2
Kagoshima 1.85 1.45–2.33 2.4 10.9
SBPH S 0.18 0.13–0.24 2.5
Kagoshima 5.32 3.03–9.18 0.9 30.2
Fipronil BPH S 0.26 0.21–0.32 2.6
Kagoshima 2.37 1.87–2.98 2.2 9.1
WBPH S 0.17 0.13–0.21 2.3
Kagoshima 12.06 9.28–15.53 2.0 71.0
SBPH S 0.23 0.18–0.28 2.5
Kagoshima 3.72 2.24–6.10 1.0 16.5

a) BPH; N. lugens, WBPH; S. furcifera, WBPH; L. stnatellus, b) S; susceptible strains, Kagoshima; field populations collected from rice field in 2018, Kagoshima, c) mg a.i./L, d) RR (resistance ratio)=LC50 value of field strains/LC50 value of susceptible strains. e) Data from Table 1.