Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;14(11):7825–7835. doi: 10.1039/d3ra08789a

Comparison of adsorption capacity of PAA/DB18C6/GO hydrogel for Sr2+ with other adsorbents.

Adsorbents Initial Sr2+ concentration (mg L−1) Contact time (h) Initial pH Maximum adsorption capacity (mg g−1) Reference
Natural zeolite 10 48 7.9 1.3 16
Amorphous sodium titanates 438.6 96 7 193.93 42
ZrP/18C6 380 6 7 195.74 43
Polyvinyl alcohol–sulfosuccinic acid 200 6 6.0 60.7 44
P(vinylsulphonic acid/2-acryloamido-2-methyl-1-propanesulphonic acid/magnetic nanoparticles)-carboxymethylcellulose 400 24 6 330 45
Poly(acrylonitrile–butadiene–styrene) 400 1 7 177 46
Hydroxyapatite/poly(acrylamide–acrylic acid) 50 1 6 53.59 47
Acrylic acid/charcoal/montmorillonite 100 48 9.8 26.68 48
Methacrylic acid cryogels 100 24 6.0 209 25
Poly(N-vinyl imidazole-cl-ethylene glycol dimethacrylate) 1000 1 7.0 240.96 49
PAA 772 5 7 347.85 This study
PAA/DB18C6/GO 772 5 7 379.35 This study