Table 2.
Comparing the average of biometric factors between two groups
| Index | Mean ± SD | p | F | Partial Eta squared |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cutometer R2 | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 0.83 ± 0.09 | 0.97 | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 0.83 ± 0.09 | |||
| Cutometer R5 | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 0.97 ± 0.22 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 1.01 ± 0.25 | |||
| Cutometer R7 | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 0.61 ± 0.14 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 0.58 ± 0.14 | |||
| Complete thickness | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 1099.90 ± 167.59 | 0.06 | 3.94 | 0.18 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 989.00 ± 131.70 | |||
| Epidermal thickness | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 94.80 ± 8.51 | 0.68 | 0.17 | 0.02 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 97.90 ± 14.21 | |||
| Dermal thickness | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 1005.10 ± 162.85 | 0.05 | 4.24 | 0.20 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 891.10 ± 121.52 | |||
| Complete density | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 22.95 ± 4.78 | 0.16 | 2.11 | 0.12 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 23.23 ± 4.96 | |||
| Epidermal density | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 51.17 ± 4.55 | 0.35 | 0.92 | 0.06 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 50.69 ± 3.74 | |||
| Dermal density | ||||
| Microneedling + conditioned medium | 20.21 ± 4.99 | 0.13 | 2.46 | 0.13 |
| Microneedling + normal saline | 20.16 ± 5.08 | |||