Table 2.
Predictive performance of several deep learning models in the test set
| Model | AUC (95%CI) | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | PPV | NPV |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CT_origin | 0.544 (0.435–0.653) | 0.536 | 0.507 | 0.585 | 0.679 | 0.407 |
| CT_TL | 0.701 (0.595–0.808) | 0.688 | 0.746 | 0.585 | 0.757 | 0.571 |
| PET_origin | 0.573 (0.461–0.684) | 0.536 | 0.521 | 0.561 | 0.673 | 0.404 |
| PET_TL | 0.645 (0.534–0.756) | 0.589 | 0.549 | 0.659 | 0.736 | 0.458 |
| DS_TL | 0.722 (0.622–0.822) | 0.661 | 0.676 | 0.634 | 0.762 | 0.531 |
| TS_TL | 0.730 (0.629–0.830) | 0.670 | 0.676 | 0.659 | 0.774 | 0.540 |
Bold numbers indicate the best results for each evaluation metric
AUC Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, PPV positive predictive value, NPV Negative predictive value, CT_origin CT model from scratch, CT_TL CT transfer learning, PET_origin PET model from scratch, PET_TL PET transfer learning, DS_TL dual-stream transfer learning, TS_TL three-stream transfer learning