Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 5;25:195. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07291-7

Table 1.

Rheumatoid factor and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies in the studied groups

RA
(n = 20)
FDRs
(n = 25)
Controls
(n = 10)
P
RF (< 15.9 IU/ml)
Negative No. (%) 2 (10.0%) 25 (100.0%) 10 (100.0%) < 0.001*
Positive No. (%) 18 (90.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%)
Min. – Max. 9.0–697.0 4.80–12.70 8.20–11.75 < 0.001*
Mean ± SD. 133.28 ± 176.38 9.21 ± 1.9 9.92 ± 1.19
Median 68.40 9.19 9.40
Significance between groups p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.358
ACPA(< 20 U/ml)
Negative No. (%) 3(15%) 25(100%) 10(100%) < 0.001*
Positive No. (%) 17(85%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%)
Min. – Max. 7.0–915.0 5.0–17.60 6.50–10.70 < 0.001*
Mean ± SD. 226.83 ± 266.19 11.06 ± 3.43 9.53 ± 1.34
Median 107.0 11.20 9.75
Significance between groups p1 < 0.001*, p2 < 0.001*, p3 = 0.131

p value for Kruskal Wallis test for comparing between the different groups; Significance between groups was done using Mann Whitney test; p1: p value for comparing between RA patients and FDRs; p2: p value for comparing between RA patients and controls; p3: p value for comparing between FDRs and controls; *: Statistically significant at p ≤ 0.05

RA: rheumatoid arthritis; FDRs: first degree relatives; RF: rheumatoid factor; ACPA: anti-citrullinated protein antibodies