Table 2.
Multilevel Moderated Mediation Results
| Path | Within Person | Between Person |
|---|---|---|
| Negative affect π‘’ Drinks | β0.02 [β0.08, 0.03] | β0.06 [β0.30, 0.19] |
| Negative affect π‘’ Intoxication | β0.03 [β0.06, 0.01] | 0.07 [β0.07, 0.20] |
| Negative affect π‘’ Coping motives | 0.21 [0.18, 0.23]* | 0.59 [0.48, 0.69]* |
| Coping motives π‘’ Drinks | 0.06 [0.02, 0.09]* | 0.07 [β0.11, 0.25] |
| Coping motives π‘’ Intoxication | 0.11 [0.08, 0.13]* | 0.14 [0.04, 0.24]* |
| Positive affect π‘’ Drinks | 0.02 [β0.03, 0.08] | β0.01 [β0.26, 0.25] |
| Positive affect π‘’ Intoxication | 0.001 [β0.037, 0.039] | 0.11 [β0.03, 0.25] |
| Positive affect π‘’ Enhance motives | 0.13 [0.11, 0.16]* | 0.20 [0.04, 0.37]* |
| Enhance motives π‘’ Drinks | 1.00 [0.96, 1.03]* | 0.32 [0.20, 0.44]* |
| Enhance motives π‘’ Intoxication | 0.74 [0.71, 0.76]* | 0.26 [0.20, 0.33]* |
| SA π‘’ Drinks | 0.024 [0.004, 0.026]* | |
| SA π‘’ Intoxication | 0.004 [β0.002, 0.010] | |
| SA π‘’ Coping motives | β0.01 [β0.03, 0.01] | |
| SA π‘’ Enhance motives | 0.03 [β0.05, 0.10] | |
| SA x Negative affect π‘’ Coping motives | 0.012 [0.003, 0.022]* | |
| SA x Positive affect π‘’ Enhance motives | β0.004 [β0.023, 0.015] | |
| Day π‘’ Drinks | 0.005 [0.000, 0.009] | |
| Day π‘’ Intoxication | β0.001 [β0.004, 0.002] | |
| Day π‘’ Coping motives | 0.000 [β0.002, 0.003] | |
| Day π‘’ Enhance motives | 0.001 [β0.002, 0.004] | |
| Weekend π‘’ Drinks | 0.52 [0.43, 0.60]* | |
| Weekend π‘’ Intoxication | 0.26 [0.21, 0.32]* | |
| Weekend π‘’ Coping motives | 0.02 [β0.03, 0.06] | |
| Weekend π‘’ Enhance motives | 0.38 [0.33, 0.43]* | |
| Covariances | ||
| Coping with Enhance motives | 0.13 [0.11, 0.16]* | 0.39 [0.31, 0.48]* |
| Drinks with Intoxication | 1.51 [1.45, 1.57]* | 0.34 [0.27, 0.43]* |
| Indirect Effects | ||
| Negative affect π‘’ Coping motives π‘’ Drinks | 0.012 [0.004, 0.020]* | |
| β- in those without SA | 0.04 [β0.06, 0.15] | |
| β- in those with SA | 0.05 [β0.07, 0.18] | |
| Negative affect π‘’ Coping motives π‘’ Intoxication | 0.02 [0.02, 0.03]* | |
| β- in those without SA | 0.08 [0.02, 0.14]* | |
| β- in those with SA | 0.09 [0.02, 0.17]* | |
| Positive affect π‘’ Enhance motives π‘’ Drinks | 0.13 [0.11, 0.16]* | |
| β- in those without SA | 0.06 [0.01, 0.13]* | |
| β- in those with SA | 0.052 [β0.001, 0.118] | |
| Positive affect π‘’ Enhance motives π‘’ Intoxication | 0.10 [0.08, 0.12]* | |
| β- in those without SA | 0.05 [0.01, 0.10]* | |
| β- in those with SA | 0.044 [0.000, 0.094] |
Note. SA = sexual assault. Estimates are medians of the posterior distribution, with the 95% credibility intervals in brackets. Indirect effects for those with SA were estimated at the median SA severity for those with SA (a value of 8).
effects that are present, indicated by a credibility interval not containing zero.