Table 2. Purpose, illustrative measures and limitations of each approach.
| Purpose | Illustrative measures | Limitations |
|---|---|---|
| Perspectives on contraceptive method characteristics | ||
| • Prioritize method characteristics
to target in product development |
• Frequency distribution of preferred
method characteristics |
• Bound by list of characteristics anticipated by the
researcher • No information on how to combine characteristics |
| Reactions to product in development | ||
| • Prioritize methods for continued
development efforts |
• Overall interest in using the method
• Perceived advantages and disadvantages of the method |
• Complexity of concisely describing methods
• Bound by method characteristics included in the description of the method • Social desirability bias |
| Trade-offs between contraceptive method characteristics | ||
| • Inform potential adjustments
to product design in terms of trade-offs between method characteristics |
• Importance ranking of method
characteristics |
• Complexity of design balancing statistical
considerations, cognitive burden on respondent, and technically feasible product designs • Bound by method characteristics included in the description of the method Unknown predictive validity |
| Blue-sky ideas on novel contraceptive technologies | ||
| • Generate innovative ideas for
new product designs |
• List of user-generated ideas for
potential novel product designs |
• Difficulty abstracting from existing product
designs among participants • Unknown external validity |