Table 11.
Results of studies for ALB using four Heuristic method.
Work-station |
Assembly Line Balancing Methods |
|||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hoffman |
Comsoal |
RPW |
M & Y |
|||||
Op. | Eff. (%) | Op. | Eff. (%) | Op. | Eff. (%) | Op. | Eff. (%) | |
1 | 1 | 93.481 | 1 | 93.481 | 1 | 93.407 | 18 | 93.481 |
2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | |||||
7 | 7 | 7 | 2 | |||||
13 | 13 | 8 | 13 | |||||
18 | 18 | 9 | 7 | |||||
21 | 21 | 13 | 21 | |||||
2 | 3 | 99.259 | 3 | 99.259 | 3 | 92.740 | 14 | 94.962 |
8 | 8 | 5 | 19 | |||||
14 | 14 | 6 | 3 | |||||
16 | 16 | 16 | 22 | |||||
3 | 4 | 99.333 | 4 | 99.333 | 4 | 91.333 | 15 | 98.296 |
9 | 9 | 14 | 20 | |||||
15 | 15 | 15 | 8 | |||||
22 | 22 | 11 | ||||||
4 | 5 | 93.037 | 5 | 93.037 | 18 | 91.629 | 9 | 89.481 |
17 | 17 | 20 | 16 | |||||
19 | 19 | 21 | 17 | |||||
11 | 11 | 22 | 28 | |||||
5 | 6 | 99.925 | 6 | 99.925 | 10 | 98.740 | 23 | 55.037 |
20 | 20 | |||||||
26 | 26 | |||||||
6 | 10 | 98.740 | 10 | 98.740 | 19 | 78.296 | 4 | 75.555 |
17 | ||||||||
11 | 25 | |||||||
28 | ||||||||
7 | 12 | 98.814 | 12 | 98.814 | 12 | 88.814 | 5 | 99.185 |
28 | 28 | 29 | 6 | |||||
29 | 29 | 24 | ||||||
8 | 23 | 55.037 | 23 | 55.037 | 23 | 55.037 | 10 | 98.740 |
9 | 24 | 96.296 | 24 | 96.296 | 24 | 96.296 | 12 | 88.814 |
27 | 27 | 27 | 29 | |||||
10 | 25 | 54.296 | 25 | 54.296 | 25 | 54.296 | 26 | 94.666 |
27 | ||||||||
11 | – | – | – | – | 26 | 50.222 | – | – |
Line Eff. (%) | 93.955 | 93.955 | 84.414 | 93.955 | ||||
Loss of Balance (%) | 6.044 | 6.044 | 14.585 | 6.044 |