Table 5.
SNR% for three types of tactile sensors after eight denoising methods.
| Butterworth [19] | Wavelet [20] | EMD [22] | VMD [24] | MA [26] | RPCA [27] | WRPCA [28] | cc-DWRPCA [13] | ANOVAa | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 × 4 | 15.33 ± 6.022 | 11.58 ± 3.638 | 13.47 ± 5.142 | 15.15 ± 6.050 | 12.80 ± 4.309 | 14.47 ± 3.063 | 16.91 ± 6.454 | 19.32 ± 4.531 | p < 0.05 |
| 4 × 6 | 10.98 ± 10.57 | 8.271 ± 8.288 | 9.555 ± 9.351 | 10.87 ± 10.55 | 9.092 ± 8.951 | 12.69 ± 6.892 | 11.98 ± 11.16 | 16.30 ± 8.933 | p < 0.05 |
| 5 × 5−1 | 25.08 ± 5.373 | 16.75 ± 2.656 | 16.40 ± 4.616 | 20.10 ± 7.605 | 19.05 ± 3.104 | 15.61 ± 4.593 | 25.82 ± 5.188 | 27.28 ± 3.493 | p < 0.05 |
The one-way ANOVA results indicate the significant difference among SNR% of the eight algorithms.