Table 2.
Comparison of demographic characteristics of the study participants between healthy and COVID-19 groups
| Variable | COVID-19 group n = 147 |
Healthy group n = 363 |
p | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | Female | 103 (70.1%) | 126 (34.7%) | < 0.001* |
| Male | 44 (29.9%) | 237 (65.3%) | ||
| Education level | Illiterate or primary education | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.3%) | < 0.001* |
| Highschool and below | 9 (6.1%) | 4 (1.1%) | ||
| High school graduate | 45 (30.6%) | 27 (7.4%) | ||
| Diploma | 11 (7.5%) | 31 (8.5%) | ||
| Bachelor | 0 (0.0%) | 173 (47.7%) | ||
| Masters | 78 (53.1%) | 110 (30.3%) | ||
| PhD and above | 3 (2.0%) | 15 (4.1%) | ||
| Clerical education | 0 (0.0%) | 2 (0.6%) | ||
| Age | 20–30 years old | 10 (6.8%) | 26 (7.2%) | 0.931 |
| 30–40 years old | 60 (40.8%) | 153 (42.1%) | ||
| 40 years old and above | 77 (52.4%) | 184 (50.7%) | ||
| Marital status | Single | 23 (15.6%) | 69 (19.0%) | 0.163 |
| Married | 119 (81.0%) | 291 (80.2%) | ||
| Widowed | 2 (1.4%) | 1 (0.3%) | ||
| Divorced | 3 (2.0%) | 2 (0.6%) | ||
| Weight (kg) | 40–60 kg | 8 (5.4%) | 36 (9.9%) | < 0.001* |
| 60–90 kg | 65 (44.2%) | 245 (67.5%) | ||
| 90 kg and above | 74 (50.3%) | 82 (22.6%) | ||
| Working sector | Secretariat | 12 (8.2%) | 1 (0.6%) | < 0.001* |
| General office of the Mayor | 9 (6.1%) | 40 (11.0%) | ||
| Deputy of Finance | 14 (9.5%) | 10 (2.8%) | ||
| Human recourse development | 13 (8.8%) | 19 (5.2%) | ||
| Deputy of planning | 1 (0.7%) | 6 (1.7%) | ||
| Urban planning and architecture | 2 (1.4%) | 4 (1.1%) | ||
| Transportation and traffic | 22 (15.0%) | 70 (19.3%) | ||
| City services | 30 (20.4%) | 59 (16.3%) | ||
| Social and cultural affairs | 11 (7.5%) | 15 (4.1%) | ||
| Technical and civil | 5 (3.4%) | 11 (3.0%) | ||
| Regional affairs | 5 (3.4%) | 2 (0.6%) | ||
| Municipality of regions | 23 (15.6%) | 125 (34.4%) | ||
| Living place condition | Good | 67 (45.6%) | 120 (35.9%) | 0.109 |
| Moderate | 68 (46.3%) | 189 (56.6%) | ||
| Poor | 12 (8.2%) | 25 (7.5%) | ||
* Significant difference in distribution pattern using the chi-square test