Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 6;24:290. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09181-8

Table 2.

Comparison of demographic characteristics of the study participants between healthy and COVID-19 groups

Variable COVID-19 group
n = 147
Healthy group
n = 363
p
Gender Female 103 (70.1%) 126 (34.7%) < 0.001*
Male 44 (29.9%) 237 (65.3%)
Education level Illiterate or primary education 1 (0.7%) 1 (0.3%) < 0.001*
Highschool and below 9 (6.1%) 4 (1.1%)
High school graduate 45 (30.6%) 27 (7.4%)
Diploma 11 (7.5%) 31 (8.5%)
Bachelor 0 (0.0%) 173 (47.7%)
Masters 78 (53.1%) 110 (30.3%)
PhD and above 3 (2.0%) 15 (4.1%)
Clerical education 0 (0.0%) 2 (0.6%)
Age 20–30 years old 10 (6.8%) 26 (7.2%) 0.931
30–40 years old 60 (40.8%) 153 (42.1%)
40 years old and above 77 (52.4%) 184 (50.7%)
Marital status Single 23 (15.6%) 69 (19.0%) 0.163
Married 119 (81.0%) 291 (80.2%)
Widowed 2 (1.4%) 1 (0.3%)
Divorced 3 (2.0%) 2 (0.6%)
Weight (kg) 40–60 kg 8 (5.4%) 36 (9.9%) < 0.001*
60–90 kg 65 (44.2%) 245 (67.5%)
90 kg and above 74 (50.3%) 82 (22.6%)
Working sector Secretariat 12 (8.2%) 1 (0.6%) < 0.001*
General office of the Mayor 9 (6.1%) 40 (11.0%)
Deputy of Finance 14 (9.5%) 10 (2.8%)
Human recourse development 13 (8.8%) 19 (5.2%)
Deputy of planning 1 (0.7%) 6 (1.7%)
Urban planning and architecture 2 (1.4%) 4 (1.1%)
Transportation and traffic 22 (15.0%) 70 (19.3%)
City services 30 (20.4%) 59 (16.3%)
Social and cultural affairs 11 (7.5%) 15 (4.1%)
Technical and civil 5 (3.4%) 11 (3.0%)
Regional affairs 5 (3.4%) 2 (0.6%)
Municipality of regions 23 (15.6%) 125 (34.4%)
Living place condition Good 67 (45.6%) 120 (35.9%) 0.109
Moderate 68 (46.3%) 189 (56.6%)
Poor 12 (8.2%) 25 (7.5%)

* Significant difference in distribution pattern using the chi-square test