Table 3. The bottom 10 molecules predicted least likely to be SMM.
‘No’ if reported not, and ‘–’ if AC susceptibility measurements were not performed.
| CCDC | Score | SMM | Metal | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PIVGAD | 0.9990 | – | Nd2Cu2 | Gheorghe et al. (2007 ▸) |
| 2 | TOKRAO | 0.9990 | No | Ni15 | Muche et al. (2014 ▸) |
| 3 | VICQUV | 0.9991 | – | Nd2 | Zou et al. (2013 ▸) |
| 4 | VAKLEY | 0.9994 | – | Nd | Ling et al. (1989 ▸) |
| 5 | YUTCAS | 0.9994 | – | Nd2Zn2 | Lü et al. (2010 ▸) |
| 6 | YEBPOL | 0.9994 | – | PrCu2 | Gheorghe et al. (2006 ▸) |
| 7 | XUXNEK | 0.9995 | – | Pr2Cu2 | Pointillart et al. (2010 ▸) |
| 8 | SIGZIU | 0.9995 | – | Nd3Zn6 | Song et al. (2018 ▸) |
| 9 | SIGZEQ | 0.9996 | – | Nd8Zn12 | Song et al. (2018 ▸) |
| 10 | TIYGUF | 0.9998 | – | Nd6Cd18 | Yang et al. (2013 ▸) |