Table 2.
Evaluation of the quality of the studies.
| Author (year) | Type of study | Reviewer | JBI critical checklist | JBI overall | Agreement | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | ||||||
| Karlsmark et al. (32) | Quasi-experimental Pre-post | J | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | y | u | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| M | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | y | u | 7 | ||||
| Vlachou et al. (33) | Quasi-experimental | J | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 7 | 7 | 89% |
| M | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 7 | ||||
| Wang et al. (34) | Quasi-experimental | J | y | y | n | n | y | y | y | y | y | 7 | 7 | 100% |
| M | y | y | u | n | y | y | y | y | y | 7 | ||||
| Moiemen et al. (35) | Quasi-experimental | J | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | n | n | 6 | 6 | 89% |
| M | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | n | n | 6 | ||||
| Abarca-Buis et al. (36) | Quasi-experimental | J | y | y | y | n | y | y | y | n | n | 6 | 6 | 89% |
| M | y | y | y | u | y | y | y | n | n | 6 | ||||
y, Yes; n, No; u, Unclear; na, Not applicable; In bold: disagreement.