Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 21;9(1):5–68. doi: 10.1177/23969873231219416

Table 3.

GRADE evidence profile for PICO3 – In patients with lacunar stroke, does immediate antihypertensive treatment (considering agent and BP target), compared to avoiding this intervention, reduce functional outcome, MACE and other outcomes?

Certainty assessment No of patients Effect Certainty Importance
No of studies Study design Risk of bias Inconsist-ency Indirect-ness Imprec-ision Other consider-ations Interv-ention Compar-ator Odds Ratio (95% CI) Absolute (95% CI)
Functional Outcome
4 Randomised trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None NR NR OR 0.98 (0.74,1.28),* 1 fewer per 1000
(from 1 fewer to 1 fewer) ***
⨁⨁⨁○
Moderate
CRITICAL
OR 0.99 (0.78, 1.27)**
MACE
2 Randomised trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None 25/321 (7.8%) 21/359 (5.8%) OR 1.33
(0.73, 2.44)
18 more per 1000
(from 15 fewer to 73 more)
⨁⨁⨁○
Moderate
CRITICAL
Shift in mRS distribution
2 Randomised trials Not serious Not serious Not serious Seriousa None -/634 -/613 OR 0.98
(0.72, 1.34),*
1 fewer per 1000
(from 1 fewer to 1 fewer)0 fewer per 1000
(from 0 fewer to 0 fewer)
⨁⨁⨁○
Moderate
CRITICAL
OR 0.94
(0.80, 1.10)**

CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio; a Confidence interval crosses the clinical decision threshold.

*

Represents odds ratio for continuing anti-hypertensives (ENOS).

**

Represents odds ratio for transdermal glyceryl trinitrate (ENOS).

***

Represents identical absolute 95% CI for both * and **