TABLE 1.
Statistical analysis of the plaque size dataa
| MDV |
P value for plaque size of MDV pair
|
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| v20 | v20ΔgC | v20ΔgC-R | v20ΔMgC | v20ExpgC | v20ExpΔMgC | |
| v20 | <0.0001 | 0.1733 | 0.0013 | <0.0001 | 0.5372 | |
| v20ΔgC | <0.0001 | 0.0002 | 0.0204 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| v20ΔgC-R | 0.1723 | 0.0002 | 0.0693 | <0.0001 | 0.3647 | |
| v20ΔMgC | 0.0013 | 0.0202 | 0.0688 | <0.0001 | 0.0032 | |
| v20ExpgC | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | <0.0001 | |
| v20ExpΔMgC | 0.5350 | <0.0001 | 0.3628 | 0.0032 | <0.0001 | |
Plaque areas were analyzed by analysis of variance using SAS version 8.2 for Windows software (59). Data sets were compared, and P values for the plaque sizes of pairs of MDV mutants were determined by the two-sided Wilcoxon two-sample test for normal approximation (values above the diagonal) or by the Kruskal-Wallis test (values below the diagonal). Multiple testing required the adjustment of α to 0.0033 (0.05/15). Therefore, only P values of <0.0033 were considered significant.