Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 6.
Published in final edited form as: J Fam Psychol. 2023 Mar 23;37(6):853–863. doi: 10.1037/fam0001087

Table 2.

Results of Single and Multigroup Analyses

Model χ2(df) CFI RMSEA Model comparison Δχ2 Δdf p value

Single-group analysis with control variables
 M1: Mother-daughter group (n = 260) 284.46 (215) .97 .04
 M2: Mother-son group (n = 214) 331.78 (215) .93 .05
 M3: Father-daughter group (n = 244) 357.45 (215) .93 .05
 M4: Father-son group (n = 205) 330.73 (215) .94 .05
Multigroup analysis with control variables
 M5: Unconstrained model 1,304.51 (860) .94 .02
 M6: Constrained model A (autoregressive and cross-lagged paths) 1,484.27 (1,010) .94 .02 6 versus 5 179.76 150 >.05
 M7: Constrained model B (all paths including control variables) 1,774.36 (1,295) .94 .02 7 versus 5 469.85 435 >.05
Multigroup analysis without control variables
 M8: Unconstrained model 162.84 (100) .98 .03
 M9: Constrained model 344.63 (250) .98 .02 9 versus 8 180.79 150 >.05

Note. df = degrees of freedom; M = model; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root-mean-square error of approximation.