Table 2.
Filtering table of the analyzed sputum samples processed with the extraction protocol involving different saponin amounts, DNase, and bead-beating treatments to test the effect of lower detergent concentrations on estimating the bias in the Gram-negative/Gram-positive bacteria ratio
| Sample | Sequenced reads produced | High-quality reads | Reads retained after Homo sapiens filtering | % filtered Homo |
| Sputum-0.0125% | 51,453 | 48,877 | 31,094 | 36.38% |
| Sputum-0.05% | 34,712 | 33,795 | 31,860 | 5.73% |
| Sputum-0.1% | 41,873 | 40,807 | 39,754 | 2.58% |
| Sputum-0.5% | 13,420 | 13,056 | 12,774 | 2.16% |
| Sputum-1.5% | 34,688 | 33,633 | 32,716 | 2.73% |
| Sputum-2% | 37,528 | 36,418 | 35,249 | 3.21% |
| Sputum-NT | 38,545 | 37,556 | 17,595 | 53.15% |
NT: Untreated.