Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 23;16(1):1–11. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.1.1

Table 2. Subgroup analysis of the accuracy of the implant placement analysis (mean ± standard deviation).

Protocol Vertical (mm) Angular (°) Platform (mm) Apex (mm)
(a) Accuracy of the implant placement based on the implanted sites
First molar Modified 0.96 ± 0.37 3.68 ± 1.99 1.18 ± 0.31 1.62 ± 0.47
Conventional 1.07 ± 0.32 4.24 ± 1.14 1.26 ± 0.28 1.89 ± 0.62
Second molar Modified 0.53 ± 0.44 5.04 ± 1.86 1.66 ± 1.00 2.20 ± 0.61
Conventional 0.65 ± 0.43 5.68 ± 2.60 1.71 ± 0.49 2.56 ± 0.98
(b) Accuracy of the implant placement based on the surgeons’ experience
Experts Modified 0.96 ± 0.37 3.68 ± 1.99 1.18 ± 0.31 1.62 ± 0.47
Conventional 1.07 ± 0.32 4.24 ± 1.14 1.26 ± 0.28* 1.89 ± 0.62*
Beginners Modified 0.53 ± 0.44 5.04 ± 1.86 1.66 ± 1.00 2.20 ± 0.61
Conventional 0.65 ± 0.43 5.68 ± 2.60 1.71 ± 0.49* 2.56 ± 0.98*
(c) Accuracy of the implant placement based the surgeons’ experience in the first molar site
Experts Modified 0.81 ± 0.28 4.06 ± 2.59 1.11 ± 0.24 1.66 ± 0.55
Conventional 1.06 ± 0.18 4.06 ± 1.49 1.26 ± 0.24 1.70 ± 0.39
Beginners Modified 1.12 ± 0.41 3.31 ± 1.29 1.25 ± 0.38 1.58 ± 0.41
Conventional 1.07 ± 0.45 4.43 ± 0.76 1.26 ± 0.34 2.09 ± 0.78
(d) Accuracy of the implant placement based the surgeons’ experience in the second molar site
Experts Modified 0.27 ± 0.33+ 5.42 ± 1.95 1.94 ± 0.38 2.33 ± 0.67
Conventional 0.48 ± 0.41 4.54 ± 1.72 1.33 ± 0.29* 1.99 ± 0.70*
Beginners Modified 0.80 ± 0.38+ 4.67 ± 1.86 1.38 ± 0.38# 2.06 ± 0.58#
Conventional 0.83 ± 0.42 6.83 ± 2.95 2.08 ± 0.35*,# 3.13 ± 0.92*,#

+ Statistical significance found between the experts and beginners within the modified protocol (P < .05).

* Statistical significance found between the experts and beginners within the conventional protocol (P < .05).

# Statistical significance found between the modified and conventional protocols within the beginners (P < .05).