Table 3.
Results of ML and DL models
| Model name | tp | fp | tn | fn | f1 | Acc (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decision Trees | 11,229 | 8690 | 2540 | 41 | 0.72 | 61.2 |
| XGB | 8895 | 4007 | 7223 | 2375 | 0.74 | 71.6 |
| KNN | 8867 | 6411 | 4819 | 2403 | 0.67 | 60.8 |
| RNN | 8544 | 4050 | 7180 | 2726 | 0.71 | 69.9 |
| LSTM | 4540 | 984 | 10,246 | 6730 | 0.65 | 69.5 |
| Bi-LSTM | 5223 | 1299 | 9931 | 6047 | 0.66 | 70.3 |
| BERT | 9252 | 1515 | 9715 | 2018 | 0.84 | 84.3 |
| BERTweet | 9564 | 1053 | 10,177 | 1706 | 0.88 | 87.7% |
tp true positives, fp false positives, tn true negatives, fn false negatives, f1 f1-score, acc accuracy)