Table 3.
OR for the association of dietary quality (DQI-I) with hand grip strength weakness and asymmetry*
| Nutrition Index | HGS weakness | HGS asymmetry | HGS weakness and asymmetry | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 1 | Model 2 | |||||||||||||
| OR | 95 % CI | P | OR | 95 % CI | P | OR | 95 % CI | P | OR | 95 % CI | P | OR | 95 % CI | P | OR | 95 % CI | P | |
| DQI-I, per sd | 0·87 | 0·78, 0·97 | 0·016 | 0·85 | 0·75, 0·95 | 0·007 | 0·89 | 0·80, 0·98 | 0·022 | 0·90 | 0·81, 0·99 | 0·039 | 0·77 | 0·67, 0·90 | < 0·001 | 0·77 | 0·66, 0·90 | 0·001 |
| DQI-I quartiles | ||||||||||||||||||
| Q1 | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | Ref | ||||||||||||
| Q2 | 0·88 | 0·64, 1·20 | 0·40 | 0·86 | 0·61, 1·20 | 0·37 | 0·57 | 0·42, 0·76 | < 0·001 | 0·57 | 0·43, 0·77 | < 0·001 | 0·60 | 0·40, 0·90 | 0·014 | 0·59 | 0·38, 0·90 | 0·015 |
| Q3 | 0·76 | 0·56, 1·04 | 0·09 | 0·75 | 0·53, 1·04 | 0·09 | 0·60 | 0·45, 0·79 | < 0·001 | 0·61 | 0·46, 0·81 | < 0·001 | 0·62 | 0·42, 0·92 | 0·017 | 0·64 | 0·42, 0·97 | 0·036 |
| Q4 | 0·73 | 0·54, 1·00 | 0·049 | 0·69 | 0·50, 0·97 | 0·033 | 0·69 | 0·52, 0·92 | 0·011 | 0·71 | 0·53, 0·94 | 0·017 | 0·49 | 0·32, 0·74 | < 0·001 | 0·50 | 0·32, 0·76 | 0·001 |
| P for trend | 0·033 | 0·023 | 0·022 | 0·035 | 0·002 | 0·004 | ||||||||||||
DQI-I, Dietary Quality Index – International; MVPA, moderate-to-vigorous physical activity; MET, metabolic equivalents of task.
Hand grip strength weakness was defined as maximum hand grip strength below sex-specific cut-offs (< 28 kg for males and < 18 kg for females). Hand grip strength asymmetry was defined as the ratio of maximum hand grip strength for non-dominant hand to that for dominant hand below 0·9 or over 1·1. HGS weakness and asymmetry was treated as a composite outcome if the criteria for both HGS weakness and HGS asymmetry were met. Model 1: unadjusted model. Model 2: adjusted for age (years), sex, ethnicity, total MVPA (MET-h/d) and smoking status.