Skip to main content
. 2024 Feb 21;11:e48445. doi: 10.2196/48445

Table 2.

Results of the System Usability Scale for all participants (N=120) and the System Usability Scale score contribution of individual items.

System Usability Scale analysis item Value per 5-point Likert scale response, n (%) Score contribution (1-5), mean (SD)

1 (strongly disagree) 2 (disagree) 3 (neutral) 4 (agree) 5 (strongly agree)
1. I think I would like to use this system, if I am admitted again. 0 (0) 0 (0) 7 (5.8) 42 (35) 71 (59.2) 4.53 (SD 0.61)
2. I found the system unnecessarily complex. 61 (50.8)

41 (34.2)

11 (9.2) 5 (4.2) 2 (1.7) 1.72 (SD 0.92)
3. I thought the system was easy to use. 1 (0.8)

1 (0.8)

8 (6.7) 39 (32.5) 71 (59.2) 4.48 (SD 0.73)
4. I think that I would need help from the staff to be able to use this system. 49 (40.8) 44 (36.7) 11 (9.2) 11 (9.2) 5 (4.2)

1.99 (SD 1.12)
5. I found the various functions in the system to be well correlated. 1 (0.8) 1 (0.8) 8 (6.7) 65 (54.2) 45 (37.5) 4.27 (SD 0.69)
6. I thought there was too much inconsistency in this system. 56 (46.7)

52 (43.3) 8 (6.7) 1 (0.8) 3 (2.5) 1.69 (SD 0.84)
7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly. 0 (0) 0 (0) 15 (12.5) 53 (44.2) 52 (43.3) 4.31 (SD 0.68)
8. I found the system very cumbersome to use. 70 (58.3) 42 (35) 5 (4.2) 2 (1.7) 1 (0.8) 1.52 (SD 0.73)
9. I felt very confident using the system. 2 (1.7) 6 (5) 4 (3.3) 47 (39.2) 61 (50.8) 4.33 (SD 0.89)
10. I needed to learn a lot things before I could get going with this system. 67 (55.8) 42 (35) 7 (5.8) 4 (3.3) 0 (0) 1.57 (SD 0.75)