Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Dec 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Community Health. 2023 Jul 17;48(6):1010–1014. doi: 10.1007/s10900-023-01256-y

Table 2.

Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models examining correlates of lifetime e-cigarette use.

Unadjusted models Adjusted model
OR (95% CI) aOR (95% CI)
Sex
 Female (ref.) ref. ref.
 Male 1.46** (1.11, 1.92) 1.05 (0.76, 1.45)
Age [18 – 92] 0.97*** (0.97, 0.98) 0.96*** (0.95, 0.97)
Race
 White (ref.) ref. ref.
 Black/African American 0.33*** (0.24, 0.43) 0.30*** (0.22, 0.42)
 Other race(s) 0.99 (0.64, 1.49) 0.87 (0.53, 1.41)
Saw a physician in last 12 months
 No 1.48 (0.96, 2.23) 1.22 (0.73, 2.00)
 Yes (ref.) ref ref
General Health
 Poor 1.39 (0.92, 2.07) 1.30 (0.81, 2.07)
 Fair 1.21 (0.90, 1.64) 1.17 (0.83, 1.65)
 Good (ref.) ref. ref.
 Excellent 1.97** (1.26, 3.04) 1.69 (0.99, 2.86)
Lifetime cigarette use
 No (ref.) ref. ref.
 Yes 9.29*** (6.45, 13.81) 10.60*** (6.93, 16.68)
Lifetime marijuana use
 No (ref.) ref. ref.
 Yes 4.31*** (3.18, 5.93) 1.81** (1.27, 2.61)

Note. The adjusted model adjusts for all other variables simultaneously. Significance is indicated by: *p<.05; **p<.01; ***p<.001