Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 6;24:244. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-05251-2

Table 2.

Didactic program in dietetics students’ satisfaction with learning modes used during the COVID-19 pandemic (n = 341)

Learning Mode Mean ± SD n (%)
Very Dissatisfied Somewhat Dissatisfied Neither satisfied nor
Dissatisfied
Somewhat Satisfied Very Satisfied
Lecture-based courses a
Fully in-person (n = 301) 4.14 ± 1.12 15 (5.0) 17 (5.6) 28 (9.3) 93 (30.9) 148 (49.2)
Synchronous remote (n = 316) 3.75 ± 1.14 15 (4.7) 42 (13.3) 38 (12.0) 134 (42.4) 87 (27.5)
Blended/Hybrid (n = 302) 3.74 ± 1.15 18 (6.0) 32 (10.6) 44 (14.6) 124 (41.1) 84 (27.8)
Asynchronous remote (n = 308) 3.71 ± 1.23 24 (7.8) 34 (11.0) 43 (14.0) 112 (36.4) 95 (30.8)
Laboratory-based courses a
Fully in-person (n = 268) 4.17 ± 1.14 14 (5.2) 15 (5.6) 24 (9.0) 73 (27.2) 142 (53.0)
Blended/Hybrid (n = 243) 3.59 ± 1.25 21 (8.6) 32 (13.2) 38 (15.6) 87 (35.8) 65 (26.7)
Synchronous remote (n = 250) 3.19 ± 1.42 39 (15.6) 54 (21.6) 38 (15.2) 59 (23.6) 60 (24.0)
Asynchronous remote (n = 248) 3.01 ± 1.50 55 (22.2) 53 (21.4) 33 (13.3) 49 (19.8) 58 (23.4)

aFive-point Scale: 1 = Very Dissatisfied to 5 = Very Satisfied; higher means indicate greater satisfaction