Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 6;13:30. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01375-8

Table 1.

Overview of included studies

References Type of pneumonia Year of surveillance Country Setting Patient cohort to whom surveillance was applied Number of patients (admissions) the Surveillance was Applied on Patient cohort used for validation Number of patients included for validation Number of described surveillance systems Type of surveillance system (fully automatic vs. semi-automatic) Validation Number of reference methods applied
Stern [22] nvHAP 2015–2020 USA 152 hospitals Hospitalized adult patients 3.1 Mio (2.7 Mioa Random selection of patients meeting automated surveillance criteria for nvHAP 250 (215a) 1 Fully Yes 6
Jones [25] nvHAP 2015–2020 and 2018- 2020 USA 284 hospitals Hospitalised adult patients 6.0 Mio Random selection of patients meeting automated surveillance criteria for nvHAP 250 1 Fully Yes 1
Valentine [28] HAP 2015–2017 and 2020- 2021 Austra-lia 1 hospital Hospitalised patients with (hemato-)oncologic disease 41′260 All patients meeting automated surveillance criteria for nvHAP 151 1 Fully Yes 1
Ramirez Battle [24] nvHAP 2015–2017 USA 1 hospital Random selection of patients with ≥ 3 day stay and with worsening oxygenation 120 Random selection of patients with ≥ 3 day stay and with worsening oxygenation 120 1 Fully Yes 3
Lacerna [10] nvHAP 2012–2018 USA 21 hospitals Hospitalized patients Not reported n.a n.a 1 Fully No n.a
Ji [23] nvHAP 2015–2018 USA 4 hospitals Hospitalized non-ventilated patients aged 18 years or older 489′519 Random selection of patients with ≥ 3 day stay and with worsening oxygenation 120 10 Fully Yes 1
Zilberberg [30] HAP (gramnegative) 2009–2016 USA 178 institutions Adult patients with positive microbiology culture Not reported n.a n.a 1 Fully No n.a
Wolfensberger [21] nvHAP 2016–2017 Switzer-land 1 hospital Hospitalized adult patients 39′519 3 samples: 1. Random sample of all patients; 2. Patients with discharge diagnostic code of HAP; 3. Random sample plus patients with discharge code of HAP 700 + 637 + 754 = 2091 1 Semi Yes 1
Wolfensberger [27] HAP 2016 Switzer-land 4 departments in 1 hospital Hospitalized patients from 3 surgical and 1 medical department 6064 All patients meeting automated surveillance criteria plus random sample of patients who did not meet automated surveillance criteria 165 + 590 = 755 1 Fully Yes 1
Fitzhenry [31] HAP (postoperative pneumonia) 1999–2006 USA 6 hospitals Patients with surgical procedures (inpatient and outpatient) Not reported for patients with inpatient surgical procedure exclusively Patients with inpatient surgical procedure with in-hospital postoperative pneumonia based on VASQIP surveillance 1017 1 Fully Yes 1
Bouzbid [29] HAP on ICU 2000–2006 France 1 department in 1 hospital Patients from 1 ICU with hospital stay > 48 h 1499 Patients from 1 ICU with hospital stay > 48 h 1499 6 Fully Yes 1
Haas [19] and Mendonca [20]. HAP on Neo 2001–2003 USA 1 department in 1 hospital Hospitalized patients from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) 1688 or 1692b Hospitalized patients from a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) 1688 or 1692b 1 Fully Yes 1

HAP, hospital-acquired pneumonia; ICU, intensive care unit; n.a., not applicable; Neo, neonatology; nvHAP, non-ventilator-associated hospital-acquired pneumonia; VASQIP, Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program

aSubset of patients for validation against discharge diagnostic codes

bDivergent numbers in papers of Haas et al. and Medonca et al