Skip to main content
. 2024 Mar 6;25:113. doi: 10.1186/s12931-024-02731-3

Table 2.

Frequency of progression stages grouped by visit

Baseline
(n = 601)
FU 1
(n = 561)
FU 2
(n = 493)
FU 3
(n = 435)
FU 4
(n = 395)
FU 5
(n = 354)
FU 6
(n = 321)
FU 7
(n = 207)
FU 8
(n = 75)
FU 9
(n = 16)
FU 10
(n = 8)
Significant progression 0 51 (8.7%) 64 (12.4%) 66 (14.4%) 65 (15.7%) 57 (15.5%) 53 (16.1%) 39 (17.4%) 15 (19.0%) 6 (35.3%) 3 (33.3%)
Moderate progression 0 56 (9.5%) 56 (10.9%) 44 (9.6%) 46 (11.1%) 38 (10.3%) 36 (10.9%) 16 (7.1%) 10 (12.7%) 4 (23.5%) 2 (22.2%)
Stable 561 (93.3%) 201 (34.2%) 145 (28.1%) 123 (26.9%) 103 (24.9%) 83 (22.6%) 63 (19.1%) 44 (19.6%) 20 (25.3%) 4 (23.5%) 2 (22.2%)
Improve-ment 0 103 (17.5%) 93 (18.0%) 91 (19.9%) 61 (14.8%) 52 (14.1%) 57 (17.3%) 30 (13.4%)

5

(6.3%)

1

(5.9%)

0
PFT not done 0 150 (25.6%) 135 (26.2%) 111 (24.3%) 120 (29.1%) 124 (33.7%) 112 (33.9%) 78 (34.8%) 25 (31.6%)

1

(5.9%)

1 (11.1%)

This table shows the frequencies of progression stages. Progression was classified as significant (FVC decline > 10%) or moderate progression (FVC decline 5–10%), stable (FVC decline or increase < 5%) and improvement (FVC increase ≥ 5%). At baseline, 5.5% of patients had a visit before reference and 1.2% no given reference. These patients were excluded from the further analyses. The follow-ups took place every 6 months. FU = Follow-up visit, PFT = pulmonary function test